Cella v. Fordham University
228 A.D.2d 300, 644 N.Y.2d 53, 644 N.Y.S.2d 53, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7146, 71 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 164
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 18, 1996
StatusPublished
This text of 228 A.D.2d 300 (Cella v. Fordham University) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cella v. Fordham University, 228 A.D.2d 300, 644 N.Y.2d 53, 644 N.Y.S.2d 53, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7146, 71 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 164 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).
Opinion
Defendant’s favorable evaluations of plaintiff’s job performance for over a decade and up until the time plaintiff turned 60 years old raise an issue of fact as to whether poor job performance was a pretext for age discrimination (see, Matter of O’Connor v Frawley, 175 AD2d 781). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Ross, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
O'Connor v. Frawley
175 A.D.2d 781 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
228 A.D.2d 300, 644 N.Y.2d 53, 644 N.Y.S.2d 53, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7146, 71 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cella-v-fordham-university-nyappdiv-1996.