Celina Harp v. Stephen Kobdish
This text of Celina Harp v. Stephen Kobdish (Celina Harp v. Stephen Kobdish) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-21-00434-CV
Celina Harp, Appellant
v.
Stephen Kobdish, Appellee
FROM THE 345TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D-1-AG-15-002375, THE HONORABLE DUSTIN M. HOWELL, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant’s brief was originally due on February 7, 2022. On March 3, this Court
sent a notice to appellant informing her that her brief was overdue and that a failure to file a
satisfactory response by March 14 would result in the dismissal of this appeal for want of
prosecution. To date, appellant has not filed a brief or a motion for extension of time.
Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).
__________________________________________ Darlene Byrne, Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Kelly and Smith
Dismissed for Want of Prosecution
Filed: April 14, 2022
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Celina Harp v. Stephen Kobdish, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/celina-harp-v-stephen-kobdish-texapp-2022.