Celia Sexton Tate and 1826 SPID Business Center, LLC v. Carter L. Tate and C. C. Ambassador Row, LLC
Opinion
NUMBER 13-15-00182-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
CELIA SEXTON TATE AND 1826 SPID BUSINESS CENTER, LLC, Appellants,
V.
CARTER L. TATE AND C. C. AMBASSADOR ROW, LLC, Appellees.
On appeal from the 117th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellants, Celia Sexton Tate and 1826 SPID Business Center, LLC, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 117th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 2014-DCV-0878-B. Appellants have now filed an unopposed motion to
dismiss the appeal on grounds that the parties have reached an agreement to settle and compromise their differences. Appellants requests that this Court dismiss the appeal.
The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants’ motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Appellants’ motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party incurring same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) (“Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.”). Having dismissed the appeal at appellants’ request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 30th day of July, 2015.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Celia Sexton Tate and 1826 SPID Business Center, LLC v. Carter L. Tate and C. C. Ambassador Row, LLC (Celia Sexton Tate and 1826 SPID Business Center, LLC v. Carter L. Tate and C. C. Ambassador Row, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.