Celia Sexton Tate and 1826 SPID Business Center, LLC v. Carter L. Tate and C. C. Ambassador Row, LLC

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 30, 2015
Docket13-15-00182-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Celia Sexton Tate and 1826 SPID Business Center, LLC v. Carter L. Tate and C. C. Ambassador Row, LLC (Celia Sexton Tate and 1826 SPID Business Center, LLC v. Carter L. Tate and C. C. Ambassador Row, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Celia Sexton Tate and 1826 SPID Business Center, LLC v. Carter L. Tate and C. C. Ambassador Row, LLC, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-15-00182-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

CELIA SEXTON TATE AND 1826 SPID BUSINESS CENTER, LLC, Appellants,

V.

CARTER L. TATE AND C. C. AMBASSADOR ROW, LLC, Appellees. ____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 117th District Court of Nueces County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellants, Celia Sexton Tate and 1826 SPID Business Center, LLC, perfected an

appeal from a judgment entered by the 117th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, in

cause number 2014-DCV-0878-B. Appellants have now filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that the parties have reached an agreement to settle and

compromise their differences. Appellants requests that this Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants’ motion to

dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.1(a). Appellants’ motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby

DISMISSED. In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against

the party incurring same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) (“Absent agreement of the parties,

the court will tax costs against the appellant.”). Having dismissed the appeal at

appellants’ request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will

issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 30th day of July, 2015.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Celia Sexton Tate and 1826 SPID Business Center, LLC v. Carter L. Tate and C. C. Ambassador Row, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/celia-sexton-tate-and-1826-spid-business-center-ll-texapp-2015.