Celia Scott v. Wells Fargo Bank, Texas, N.A., F/K/A Norwest Bank Texas, N.A.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 4, 2002
Docket13-02-00108-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Celia Scott v. Wells Fargo Bank, Texas, N.A., F/K/A Norwest Bank Texas, N.A. (Celia Scott v. Wells Fargo Bank, Texas, N.A., F/K/A Norwest Bank Texas, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Celia Scott v. Wells Fargo Bank, Texas, N.A., F/K/A Norwest Bank Texas, N.A., (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-02-108-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG


CELIA SCOTT , Appellant,

v.

WELLS FARGO BANK, TEXAS, N.A., F/K/A NORWEST BANK TEXAS, N.A. , Appellee.




On appeal from the 138th District Court

of Cameron County, Texas

_____________________________________________________________ __

O P I N I O N

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Hinojosa and Yanez

Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, CELIA SCOTT , attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by the 138th District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 2001-01-442-B . Judgment in this cause was signed on October 30, 2001 . A timely motion for new trial was filed on November 27, 2001. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a), appellant's notice of appeal was due on January 28, 2002 , but was not filed until February 15, 2002 .

Notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court's letter, the appeal would be dismissed. To date, no response has been received from appellant.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant's failure to timely perfect his appeal, and appellant's failure to respond to this Court's notice, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 4th day of April, 2002.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Celia Scott v. Wells Fargo Bank, Texas, N.A., F/K/A Norwest Bank Texas, N.A., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/celia-scott-v-wells-fargo-bank-texas-na-fka-norwes-texapp-2002.