Celia D. Miskevitch v. 7-Eleven, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 5, 2016·No. 05-16-00914-CV·Published

Opinion

DISMISS and Opinion Filed October 5, 2016.

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-00914-CV

CELIA D. MISKEVITCH, Appellant V. 7-ELEVEN, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-15-00611

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Lang, Myers, and Evans Opinion by Justice Lang By letter, the Court questioned its jurisdiction over this appeal because it appeared

appellee’s counterclaim for attorney’s fees remained pending. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.,

39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). We gave the parties an opportunity to address our concern.

Both parties filed responses agreeing with this Court’s assessment that the judgment is not final.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).

160914F.P05 /Douglas S. Lang/ DOUGLAS S. LANG JUSTICE Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

CELIA D. MISKEVITCH, Appellant On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-16-00914-CV V. Trial Court Cause No. DC-15-00611. Opinion delivered by Justice Lang. Justices 7-ELEVEN, INC., Appellee Myers and Evans participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee 7-ELEVEN, INC. recover its costs of this appeal from appellant CELIA D. MISKEVITCH.

Judgment entered this 5th day of October, 2016.

–2–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Celia D. Miskevitch v. 7-Eleven, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Celia D. Miskevitch v. 7-Eleven, Inc. (Celia D. Miskevitch v. 7-Eleven, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.
39 S.W.3d 191 (Texas Supreme Court, 2001)