Celauro v. United States

Second Circuit

Celauro v. United States

214 F. App'x 95

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided January 24, 2007·No. No. 06-0984-cv·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiffs-Appellants Sal Celauro, Jr., Paul Astrup, and Rosanne B. Astrup appeal a January 28, 2006 decision and order [96]*96of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Arthur D. Spatt, Judge), reduced to a judgment on January 30, dismissing their complaint with prejudice. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts, procedural history, and specification of issues on appeal.

For substantially the reasons set forth in the District Court’s January 28 decision, we affirm the judgment. We have considered all of plaintiffs-appellants’ arguments and find them without merit.

The District Court’s judgment dated January 30, 2006 is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiffs-Appellants Sal Celauro, Jr., Paul Astrup, and Rosanne B. Astrup appeal a January 28, 2006 decision and order [96]*96of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Arthur D. Spatt, Judge), reduced to a judgment on January 30, dismissing their complaint with prejudice. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts, procedural history, and specification of issues on appeal.

For substantially the reasons set forth in the District Court’s January 28 decision, we affirm the judgment. We have considered all of plaintiffs-appellants’ arguments and find them without merit.

The District Court’s judgment dated January 30, 2006 is AFFIRMED.

Celauro v. United States, 214 F. App'x 95 (2d Cir. 2007).

Pincite

214 F. App'x 95 (Celauro v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related