Celanese Corporation and Grupo Celanese, S. DE RL DE CV v. Javier Salcedo Sahagun and Ramos & Hermosillo Abogados, S.C.

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: June 4, 2019
• Docket: 05-19-00402-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

Order entered June 4, 2019

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00402-CV

CELANESE CORPORATION AND GRUPO CELANESE, S. DE RL DE CV, Appellants

V.

JAVIER SALCEDO SAHAGUN AND RAMOS & HERMOSILLO ABOGADOS, S.C., Appellees

On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-15-09284

ORDER On March 14, 2019, the trial court signed (1) an order denying a motion to dismiss

pursuant to section 27.003 of the civil practice and remedies code (the TCPA order), see TEX. CIV.

PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 27.003, and (2) an order granting a motion to dismiss for forum non

conveniens. Javier Salcedo Sahagun and Ramos & Hermosillo Abogados, S.C. (collectively

“Sahagun”) filed an interlocutory appeal of the TCPA order. See id. § 51.014(a)(12). Celanese

Corporation and Grupo Celanese, S. De Rl De Cv filed a notice of cross-appeal complaining of

the order granting the motion to dismiss for forum non conveniens.

Before the Court is the April 19, 2019 motion of Sahagun to abate appeal and lift stay.

The motion was filed in response to this Court’s April 15, 2019 letter questioning its jurisdiction over the cross-appeal, as it appeared not to be a final judgment. The motion seeks the abatement

and lift of stay so the trial court can sign a final order relating to the TCPA motion. Upon further

review of the clerk’s record, it appears the trial court’s order granting the motion to dismiss for

forum non conveniens is a final judgment over which this Court has jurisdiction. Accordingly,

we DENY as moot the motion to abate appeal and lift stay.

The posture of this appeal is such that the forum non conveniens order will be addressed

first on submission because if that order is affirmed, the TCPA order becomes moot. See Crum

& Forster Specialty Ins. Co. v. Creekstone Builders, Inc., 489 S.W.3d 473, 485 n.3 (Tex. App.—

Houston [1st Dist.] 2015, no pet.) (affirming order granting dismissal for forum non conveniens

rendered moot issue regarding ruling on motion to dismiss for failure to join necessary party). In

light of this circumstance and, on the Court’s own motion, we REALIGN the parties as follows.

Celanese Corporation and Grupo Celanese, S. De Rl De Cv are designated as appellants/cross-

appellees and Javier Salcedo Sahagun and Ramos & Hermosillo Abogados, S.C. are designated

as appellees/cross-appellants.

Appellants shall file their brief on the merits within twenty days of the date of this order.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE