Ceiva Logic, Inc. v. Frame Media, Inc.
This text of Ceiva Logic, Inc. v. Frame Media, Inc. (Ceiva Logic, Inc. v. Frame Media, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2009-1448
CEIVA LOGIC, INC.,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
FRAME MEDIA, INC.,
Defendant-Appellee,
and
DIGITAL SPECTRUM SOLUTIONS, INC.,
DOES 1-10, inclusive,
Defendant.
Gary A. Hecker, The Hecker Law Group, of Los Angeles, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was James M. Slominski.
Allen S. Rugg, Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C., of Boston, Massachusetts, argued for all defendants-appellees. With him on the brief for Frame Media, Inc., were James J. Foster and Hunter D. Keeton. On the brief for Digital Spectrum Solutions, Inc., were Robert D. Fish and Andrew Mar, Fish & Associates, P.C., of Irvine, California.
Appealed from: United States District Court for the Central District of California
Judge James V. Selna NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1448
Plaintiff-Appellant, v.
Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Central District of California
in CASE NO(S). 08-CV-636.
This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
Per Curiam (MAYER, GAJARSA, and MOORE, Circuit Judges )
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
DATED May 5, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ceiva Logic, Inc. v. Frame Media, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ceiva-logic-inc-v-frame-media-inc-cafc-2010.