Cegielski v. St. Francis Home

222 A.D.2d 1010, 636 N.Y.S.2d 677, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14046
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 22, 1995·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendant’s motion to dismiss at the close of proof. Contrary to defendant’s contention, expert testimony was not required to establish a prima facie case because this case involves ordinary negligence, not medical malpractice (see, Kerker v Hurwitz, 163 AD2d 859, remittitur amended 166 AD2d 931; see generally, White v Sheehan Mem. Hosp., 119 AD2d 989). The court also properly refused to charge the affirmative defense of culpable conduct; there was no evidence that plaintiff’s decedent was negligent (see, Willis v Young Men’s Christian Assn., 28 NY2d 375, 377-378). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Notaro, J. — Negligence.) Present — Pine, J. P., Fallon, Wesley, Balio and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cegielski v. St. Francis Home, 222 A.D.2d 1010, 636 N.Y.S.2d 677, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14046 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

222 A.D.2d 1010 (Cegielski v. St. Francis Home) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lidge v. Niagara Falls Memorial Medical Center
17 A.D.3d 1033 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)