Cegielski v. St. Francis Home
Opinion
—Judgment unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendant’s motion to dismiss at the close of proof. Contrary to defendant’s contention, expert testimony was not required to establish a prima facie case because this case involves ordinary negligence, not medical malpractice (see, Kerker v Hurwitz, 163 AD2d 859, remittitur amended 166 AD2d 931; see generally, White v Sheehan Mem. Hosp., 119 AD2d 989). The court also properly refused to charge the affirmative defense of culpable conduct; there was no evidence that plaintiff’s decedent was negligent (see, Willis v Young Men’s Christian Assn., 28 NY2d 375, 377-378). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Notaro, J. — Negligence.) Present — Pine, J. P., Fallon, Wesley, Balio and Boehm, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
222 A.D.2d 1010 (Cegielski v. St. Francis Home) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.