Ceeside Associates v. Board of Standards & Appeals

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ceeside Associates v. Board of Standards & Appeals

88 A.D.2d 640, 450 N.Y.S.2d 224, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16861

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 17, 1982

StatusPublished

This text of 88 A.D.2d 640 (Ceeside Associates v. Board of Standards & Appeals) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ceeside Associates v. Board of Standards & Appeals, 88 A.D.2d 640, 450 N.Y.S.2d 224, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16861 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York, dated July 21,1981 and made after a hearing, which denied petitioner’s application for a use variance to convert an existing five-story building from a proprietary home for adults into a hotel in an R-5 district. Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements. The Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioner’s application for a variance (see Zoning Resolution of City of New York, § 72-21; Matter of Otto v Steinhilber, 282 NY 71). Damiani, J. P., Mangano, Gibbons and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York, dated July 21,1981 and made after a hearing, which denied petitioner’s application for a use variance to convert an existing five-story building from a proprietary home for adults into a hotel in an R-5 district. Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements. The Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioner’s application for a variance (see Zoning Resolution of City of New York, § 72-21; Matter of Otto v Steinhilber, 282 NY 71). Damiani, J. P., Mangano, Gibbons and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

88 A.D.2d 640, 450 N.Y.S.2d 224, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16861, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ceeside-associates-v-board-of-standards-appeals-nyappdiv-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack