Cedrick Bernard Lewis v. State

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: February 18, 2015
• Docket: 12-14-00201-CR
• Status: Published

Opinion

ACCEPTED 12-14-00201-CR TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 2/18/2015 3:52:22 PM CATHY LUSK CLERK

NO ORAL ARGUMENT R E Q U E S T E D

FILED IN C A U S E NO. 12-14-00201-CR 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 2/18/2015 3:52:22 PM IN T H E CATHY S. LUSK COURT OF APPEALS Clerk TWELFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER, TEXAS

CEDRICK LEWIS Appellant

vs.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Appeal in C a u s e No. 31189 O n A p p e a l f r o m t h e T h i r d Judicial District C o u r t of Anderson County, T e x a s

BRIEF FOR APPELLANT

Philip C . Fletcher Texas Bar No. 00787478 800 North Mallard Palestine, Texas 75801 Telephone No.: (903) 731-4440 Facsimile No.: (903)731-4474 Email: fletchlaw@yahoo.com

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT

1 T A B L E OF CONTENTS

PAGE NO.

Table of Contents 2

List of Authorities 3

Appearances 4

Address to the Court 5

S t a t e m e n t of the C a s e 6

Issue Presented 7

S t a t e m e n t of Facts 8

S u m m a r y of the A r g u m e n t 9

Argument, Point of Error N u m b e r O n e 10

Prayer 13

Certificate of C o m p l i a n c e - T e x a s R u l e s of Appellate Procedure 9.4(i)(3) 14

Certificate of Service 15

2 LIST OF AUTHORITIES

CASES: PAGE NO.

Cookv. State, 902S.W.2d471,480(Tex.Cr.App. 1995) 11

STATUTES: P A G E NO.

Texas Penal Code Section 20.01(1) 10

Texas Penal Code Section 20.01(2) 10

Texas Penal Code Section 20.04 10

CONSTITUTION: PAGE NO.

T e x a s C o n s t i t u t i o n A r t i c l e I, §10 10

T e x a s C o n s t i t u t i o n A r t i c l e V , §12(b) 10

3 APPEARANCES

P u r s u a n t t o Rule 38.1 (a), T e x a s R u l e s o f A p p e l l a t e P r o c e d u r e , A p p e l l a t e p r o v i d e s a c o m p l e t e list o f all p a r t i e s a n d n a m e s a n d a d d r e s s e s o f C o u n s e l :

Trial Defendant: Cedrick Lewis

Trial Defendant's Counsel: Colin D. McFall Attorney at Law 617 East Lacy Street, Suite 106 Palestine, Texas 75801-2965 Telephone: (903)723-1923 Facsimile: (903) 723-0269

Trial State's Counsel: Scott Holden Erica Morgan A n d e r s o n C o u n t y A s s i s t a n t District A t t o r n e y 500 North Church Street Palestine, T e x a s 75801 Telephone: (903) 723-7400 Facsimile: (903) 723-7818

Appellant: Cedrick Lewis

Appellant's Counsel: Philip C . Fletcher Attorney at Law 800 North Mallard Street Palestine, T e x a s 75801 Telephone: (903)731-4440 Facsimile: (903)731-4474

Appellee's Counsel: Scott Holden A n d e r s o n C o u n t y A s s i s t a n t District A t t o r n e y 500 North Church Street Palestine, Texas 75801 Telephone: (903) 723-7400 Facsimile: (903) 723-7818

4 C A U S E NO. 12-14-00201-CR

IN T H E COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER, TEXAS

A p p e a l in C a u s e N o . 3 1 1 8 9 O n A p p e a l f r o m t h e Third Judicial District C o u r t of Anderson County, T e x a s

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE COURT OF APPEALS:

C O M E S N O W , C E D R I C K L E W I S , hereinafter referred to as Appellant, and submits this Brief in s u p p o r t o f t h e A p p e l l a n t ' s r e q u e s t t h a t j u d g m e n t r e n d e r e d in C a u s e N u m b e r 31189 be reversed.

5 STATEMENT OF THE CASE

A p p e l l a n t w a s indicted in C a u s e N u m b e r 3 1 1 8 9 w i t h t h e o f f e n s e s o f A g g r a v a t e d

Kidnapping and Unauthorized U s e of a Motor Vehicle. T h e s e offenses w e r e alleged to

h a v e o c c u r r e d o n D e c e m b e r 1 8 , 2 0 1 2 , in A n d e r s o n C o u n t y , T e x a s . A p p e l l a n t pled n o t

guilty to t h e s e charges. O n J u n e 10 thru 16, 2 0 1 4 , t h e s e c a s e s w e r e tried to a jury. The

jury f o u n d Appellant guilty of t h e lesser included charges of A t t e m p t e d Aggravated

Kidnapping and Unauthorized Use of a Motor Vehicle. O n J u n e 16, 2014, the Court

a s s e s s e d Appellant's p u n i s h m e n t for C a u s e N u m b e r 3 1 1 8 9 at eighty (80) y e a r s in t h e

T e x a s Department of Criminal Justice on 2 0 counts of Attempted Aggravated Kidnapping

and t w o (2) y e a r s S t a t e Jail o n U n a u t h o r i z e d U s e of a M o t o r Vehicle. O n July 14, 2 0 1 4 ,

Appellant timely g a v e his Notice of Appeal to this Honorable Court. Appellant n o w timely

files this Brief in s u p p o r t o f t h e A p p e l l a n t ' s r e q u e s t t h a t t h e j u d g m e n t s o f c o n v i c t i o n for

A t t e m p t e d A g g r a v a t e d K i d n a p p i n g r e n d e r e d in C a u s e N u m b e r 3 1 1 8 9 b e r e v e r s e d .

6 ISSUES PRESENTED

Point of Error Number One: T h ejudgments o f conviction f o r Attempted

A g g r a v a t e d K i d n a p p i n g a r e void b e c a u s e t h e trial court lacked jurisdiction i n that t h e

purported indictment did not allege t h e c o m m i s s i o n o f a n y o f f e n s e s .

7 STATEMENT O F FACTS

POINT OF E R R O R NUMBER ONE:

Appellant w a s purportedly c h a r g e d with thirty ( 3 0 ) counts o f t h e o f f e n s e o f

Aggravated Kidnapping b y indictment which read in pertinent part that "CEDRIC

B E R N A R D L E W I S , o n o r a b o u t t h e 18'^ d a y o f D e c e m b e r , 2012, a n dbefore t h e

p r e s e n t m e n t o f said indictment, in said C o u n t y a n d S t a t e , did t h e n t h e r e , w i t h t h e intent to

facilitate the c o m m i s s i o n o f a felony, to-wit: U n a u t h o r i z e d U s e o f a Vehicle, o r to facilitate

t h e flight after t h e a t t e m p t o r c o m m i s s i o n o f said felony, intentionally o r k n o w i n g l y a b d u c t

(insert n a m e of alleged victim) b yrestricting t h e m o v e m e n t s of said (insert n a m e of alleged

victim) w i t h o u t his/her c o n s e n t s o a s t o interfere w i t h his/her liberty, by m o v i n g h i m / h e r f r o m

o n e place t o another, confining him/her, with the intent to prevent his/her liberation, o r by

s e c r e t i n g o r holding h i m / h e r in a p l a c e w h e r e h e / s h e w a s n o t likely t o b e f o u n d . " ( C l e r k ' s

Record pgs. 8-22)

8 SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT

Appellant's judgments of conviction for Attempted Aggravated Kidnapping are void

b e c a u s e t h e trial c o u r t l a c k e d j u r i s d i c t i o n in t h a t t h e p u r p o r t e d i n d i c t m e n t did n o t e s t a b l i s h

t h e c o n s t i t u t i o n a l r e q u i s i t e s o f a n i n d i c t m e n t a s r e q u i r e d b y A r t i c l e V , §12(b) a n d A r t i c l e

I, §10 o f t h e T e x a s C o n s t i t u t i o n b y f a i l i n g t o a l l e g e t h e c o m m i s s i o n o f a n o f f e n s e .

Although the purported indictment intends t o allege the offense o f Aggravated

Kidnapping, t h e inclusion of t h e w o r d "or" b e t w e e n t h e definition of restrain a n d o n e of t h e

m e a n s b y which a person c a nb e restrained does n o tconstitutionally charge t h e

c o m m i s s i o n of Aggravated Kidnapping. T h e purported indictment wholly failed to charge

Appellant with the offense of Aggravated Kidnapping, and the purported indictment failed

t o c o m p l y w i t h t h e c o n s t i t u t i o n a l d e f i n i t i o n o f a n i n d i c t m e n t a s r e q u i r e d b y A r t i c l e V , §12(b)

a n d A r t i c l e I , §10.

S i n c e t h e p u r p o r t e d i n d i c t m e n t in this c a s e w a s constitutionally deficient a n d did n o t

v e s t t h e trial court w i t h jurisdiction, A p p e l l a n f ' s conviction i svoid. A s a result, this court

must reverse the judgment.

9 ARGUMENT

POINT OF E R R O R NUMBER ONE

Appellant's judgments of conviction for Attempted Aggravated Kidnapping are void

b e c a u s e t h e trial court l a c k e d jurisdiction in t h a t t h e p u r p o r t e d i n d i c t m e n t did n o t e s t a b l i s h

t h e c o n s t i t u t i o n a l r e q u i s i t e s o f a n i n d i c t m e n t a s r e q u i r e d b y A r t i c l e V , §12(b) a n d A r t i c l e

I, §10 o f t h e T e x a s C o n s t i t u t i o n b y f a i l i n g t o a l l e g e t h e c o m m i s s i o n o f a n o f f e n s e .

T h e purported indictment attempts to allege the offense of Aggravated Kidnapping.

T e x a s P e n a l C o d e Section 20.04 states that:

"(a) a p e r s o n c o m m i t s a n o f f e n s e if h e i n t e n t i o n a l l y o r k n o w i n g a b d u c t s a n o t h e r

person with the intent to:

(3) facilitate t h e c o m m i s s i o n o f a f e l o n y o r t h e flight after t h e a t t e m p t or

commission o fa felony."

T e x a s P e n a l C o d e Section 20.01(2) defines the word "abduct."

(2) "Abduct" m e a n s t o restrain a p e r s o n w i t h intent to p r e v e n t his liberation by:

(A) secreting o rholding h i m i n a place w h e r e h e is not likely to b e f o u n d ; o r

(B) using or threatening t ouse deadly force.

T e x a s Penal C o d e Section 20.01(1) defines the word "restrain."

(1) " R e s t r a i n " m e a n s t o restrict a p e r s o n ' s m o v e m e n t s w i t h o u t consent, s oa s t o

interfere substantially w i t h t h e p e r s o n ' s liberty, b y m o v i n g t h e p e r s o n f r o m o n e place t o

another o r by confining the person.

10 Article I § 1 0o fthe T e x a s Constitution provides that "...no person shall b e held t o

a n s w e r f o r a c r i m i n a l o f f e n s e , u n l e s s o n a n i n d i c t m e n t o f a g r a n d j u r y . . . " A r t i c l e V , §12(b)

of the T e x a s Constitution defines a n"indictment" a sa " awritten instrument presented t o

a court b y a grand jury charging a person with the c o m m i s s i o n o fa n offense." A valid

c h a r g i n g i n s t r u m e n t m u s t b ep r e s e n t e d t o t h e trial c o u r t in o r d e r t o v e s t t h e trial court w i t h

jurisdiction t o hear the case.

In t h e p r e s e n t c a s e , t h e p u r p o r t e d i n d i c t m e n t d o e s n o t a l l e g e t h e c o m m i s s i o n o f a n

offense. T h e purported charging instrument fails to m e e t the constitutional definition of a n

i n d i c t m e n t a s r e q u i r e d b y A r t i c l e V§12(b) a n d A r t i c l e I §10. A p p e l l a n t h a s a c o n s t i t u t i o n a l

right t o a charging i n s t r u m e n t sufficient t o constitute a n indictment. A valid indictment i s

r e q u i r e d t o v e s t t h e t r i a l c o u r t w i t h j u r i s d i c t i o n t o h e a r t h e c a s e a n d it i s n o t s u b j e c t t o

w a i v e r . Cook v. State, 902 S.W.2d471, 480 (Tex.Cr.App. 1995).

A p e r s o n c o m m i t s t h e o f f e n s e o f A g g r a v a t e d K i d n a p p i n g , if w i t h t h e i n t e n t t o

facilitate t h e c o m m i s s i o n of a f e l o n y or t h e flight after t h e a t t e m p t or c o m m i s s i o n of a felony,

a p e r s o n intentionally o r knowingly restrict a person's m o v e m e n t s w i t h o u t c o n s e n t , s o a s

t o interfere substantially w i t h t h e p e r s o n ' s liberty, b y m o v i n g t h e p e r s o n f r o m o n e p l a c e t o

another o r b y confining the person with intent t o prevent h i sliberation b y secreting o r

holding h i m i n a place w h e r e h e is not likely t o b e f o u n d . T h e w o r d i n g i n t h e purported

i n d i c t m e n t in t h e p r e s e n t c a s e a l l e g e s " C E D R I C B E R N A R D L E W I S , o n o r a b o u t t h e 18'^

d a y o f D e c e m b e r , 2 0 1 2 , a n d b e f o r e t h e p r e s e n t m e n t o f s a i d i n d i c t m e n t , in s a i d C o u n t y a n d

State, d i dt h e n there, with t h e intent t o facilitate t h e c o m m i s s i o n o f a felony, to-wit:

U n a u t h o r i z e d U s e o f a V e h i c l e , o r t o facilitate t h e flight after t h e a t t e m p t o rc o m m i s s i o n o f

11 said felony, intentionally or k n o w i n g l y a b d u c t (insert n a m e of alleged victim) by restricting

the m o v e m e n t s of said (insert n a m e of alleged victim) without his/her consent so a s to

interfere w i t h his/her liberty, by m o v i n g h i m / h e r f r o m o n e p l a c e t o a n o t h e r , confining

h i m / h e r , w i t h t h e i n t e n t t o p r e v e n t h i s / h e r l i b e r a t i o n , or b y s e c r e t i n g o r h o l d i n g h i m / h e r i n a

place w h e r e h e / s h e w a s not likely to be f o u n d . "

Although the purported indictment intends to allege the offense of Aggravated

K i d n a p p i n g , t h e inclusion o f t h e w o r d "or" b e t w e e n t h e definition of restrain a n d o n e o f t h e

m e a n s by which a person can be restrained does not constitutionally charge the

commission of Aggravated Kidnapping. T h e purported indictment wholly failed to charge

Appellant with the offense of Aggravated Kidnapping, and the purported indictment failed

t o c o m p l y w i t h t h e c o n s t i t u t i o n a l d e f i n i t i o n o f a n i n d i c t m e n t a s r e q u i r e d b y A r t i c l e V , §12(b)

a n d A r t i c l e I, §10.

S i n c e t h e p u r p o r t e d i n d i c t m e n t in this c a s e w a s constitutionally deficient a n d

did n o t v e s t t h e trial c o u r t w i t h j u r i s d i c t i o n , A p p e l l a n f s c o n v i c t i o n is v o i d . A s a r e s u l t , t h i s

court must reverse the judgment.

12 PRAYER

For the above and foregoing reasons, Appellant prays that Appellant's convictions

f o r A t t e m p t e d A g g r a v a t e d K i d n a p p i n g in C a u s e N o . 1 2 - 1 4 - 0 0 2 0 1 - C R , a p p e a l e d in C a u s e

N o . 3 1 1 8 9 f r o m t h e Third Judicial District C o u r t of A n d e r s o n C o u n t y , T e x a s , be reversed.

Jtespectfully submitted,

On n P H I L I P C. F L E T C H E R Attorney for Appellant

13 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

T E X A S R U L E S OF A P P E L L A T E P R O C E D U R E 9.4(i)(3)

I certify that according to t h e Microsoft W o r d p r o g r a m ' s w o r d - c o u n t function, t h e brief

filed in this m a t t e r c o n t a i n s 1,070 w o r d s excluding t h e caption, identity o f parties a n d

counsel, table of contents, index of authorities, statement of the case, statement o f issues

presented, signature, proof o f service, certification a n d certificate o f compliance.

Respectfully submitted.

PHILIP C. F L E T C H E R 800 North Mallard P. O . B o x 2 5 2 Palestine, Texas 75802 Tel: (903) 731-4440 Fax: (903) 7 3 1 M 4 7 4

PHILirC. FLETCHER State Bar No. 00787478 Attorney for C E D R I C L E W I S

14 C E R T I F I C A T E OF S E R V I C E

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy o f the a b o v e and foregoing Brief h a s been hand delivered t o Scott Holden c/o Allyson Mitchell, A n d e r s o n C o u n t y Criminal District A t t o r n e y , A t t o r n e y for A p p e l l e e , A o d f i r s o n C o u n t y C o u r t h o u s e , 5 0 0 N o r t h C h u r c h Street, Palestine, T e x a s 7 5 8 0 1 , o n t h i of February, 2015.

ILIP C. F L E T C H E R