Cedric Tate v. State of Florida

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 29, 2016
Docket15-2357
StatusPublished

This text of Cedric Tate v. State of Florida (Cedric Tate v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cedric Tate v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

CEDRIC TATE, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v. CASE NO. 1D15-2357

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________/

Opinion filed June 28, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Angela Cox, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, Barbara J. Busharis, Assistant Public Defender, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Quentin Humphrey, Assistant Attorney General, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Cedric Tate, challenges his judgment and two consecutive

mandatory minimum sentences for one count of second degree murder and one count of a convicted felon in possession of a firearm, arising from a single criminal

episode. We affirm the conviction without comment, but reverse the sentences

pursuant to Williams v. State, 186 So. 3d 989 (Fla. 2016).

At Appellant’s sentencing hearing the trial court imposed mandatory

minimum sentences under the 10-20-Life statute, as required under then-controlling

decisions. However, the Florida Supreme Court in Williams held that consecutive

sentences under section 775.087(2)(d) for offenses committed contemporaneously

are permissible but not mandatory. Thus, because the trial court believed it could not

exercise discretion in imposing consecutive mandatory minimum terms, we reverse

Appellant’s sentences and remand for resentencing.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED and REMANDED in part.

RAY, MAKAR, JJ., and DAVIS, WILLIAM, ASSOCIATE JUDGE, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ronald Williams v. State of Florida
186 So. 3d 989 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Cedric Tate v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cedric-tate-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2016.