Cedric Greene, Jr. v. Terri Harris
This text of 641 F. App'x 667 (Cedric Greene, Jr. v. Terri Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Cedric Greene appeals the district court’s 1 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) preser-vice dismissal of his pro se complaint against two defendants. After carefully reviewing the record, see Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir.2000) (per curiam) (§ 1915(e)(2)(B) dismissal reviewed de novo), we find no basis to reverse the dismissal as to either defendant, see Anderson v. Larson, 327 F.3d 762, 768-69 (8th Cir.2003) (prosecutors are entitled to absolute immunity for decision to drop charges); see also Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 173 L.Ed.2d 868 (2009) (pleading must contain sufficient factual matter to state claim that is plausible on its face). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Greene’s pending motion.
. The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas, now retired, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
641 F. App'x 667, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cedric-greene-jr-v-terri-harris-ca8-2016.