Cedric Greene, Jr. v. Terri Harris

641 F. App'x 667
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided April 12, 2016·No. 15-3462·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Cedric Greene appeals the district court’s 1 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) preser-vice dismissal of his pro se complaint against two defendants. After carefully reviewing the record, see Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir.2000) (per curiam) (§ 1915(e)(2)(B) dismissal reviewed de novo), we find no basis to reverse the dismissal as to either defendant, see Anderson v. Larson, 327 F.3d 762, 768-69 (8th Cir.2003) (prosecutors are entitled to absolute immunity for decision to drop charges); see also Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 173 L.Ed.2d 868 (2009) (pleading must contain sufficient factual matter to state claim that is plausible on its face). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Greene’s pending motion.

1

. The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas, now retired, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cedric Greene, Jr. v. Terri Harris, 641 F. App'x 667 (8th Cir. 2016).

641 F. App'x 667 (Cedric Greene, Jr. v. Terri Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ashcroft v. Iqbal
556 U.S. 662 (Supreme Court, 2009)
Anderson v. Larson
327 F.3d 762 (Eighth Circuit, 2003)