Cedric Dwight Madison v. State
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
_____________________ _____
09-17-00432-CR __________________________
Cedric Dwight Madison, Appellant V. The State of Texas, Appellee
_________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court of Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. 16-25775 _________________________________________________________________
ORDER
Appellant’s counsel filed a motion to withdraw supported by a brief
concluding that the instant appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
738, 744 (1967). Appellant’s counsel certified that counsel provided copies of the
motion and brief to Appellant, advised Appellant of Appellant’s right to examine
the appellate record and file a pro se response, and supplied Appellant with a form
motion for pro se access to the appellate record. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d
313, 319-20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). Appellant requested access to the appellate record with this Court. We
hereby direct the clerk of the trial court to provide access to a paper copy of the
reporter’s record and clerk’s record to appellant, and to provide written verification
to this Court of the date and manner in which the appellate record was provided, on
or before Friday, September 07, 2018. See id., 436 S.W.3d at 321-22.
ORDER ENTERED August 20, 2018.
PER CURIAM
Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cedric Dwight Madison v. State (Cedric Dwight Madison v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.