Cedric Bernard Walton v. State

Opinion

JllIj \<\>2s)i£

TWA IkttckA o-f "ToAS P.o. 65*. lZt>4r? /Win .71 I%1\\-Ztf1

Ul A-ppeAl Mo. bl-\S-bOttD-C&

Mr. Kuki

CWflt. On l//4//f T mi; -hr/ih^W^d ttcao Cas^hcw Umf *fa d/ewLJ &rrtc4iinal Aunhr %P.O. &>* ftf?j£kft~ Uv\J iTX "ITS2? . On *Hils Attn* day , X ia*u flotrffeJ 4kdr

/iwpc&sibk nr m^ V& dbfa/Vi /M rn£feri&.h X A*u/£ Mtrhrs p&ftJiAci in mum*pit daurrS iHut&roft i J- /tm unsure irvhiU dm <#/?/ lixis psshtultur &rr*sfon<Je<fici., 76cJ~lb\s iyiai/ -foriAJiiniiM *<jsIm If 4 rxfhir hwelu process. S under ^ dhtoid rkaf ^\iJ &iirr opwifed in pnttist prccedarej amd 4im& donstrui/ifc > ~Tf\trtrort j if uca n&i/t stiff me an4 dtfrtsptmlthU' U/imfa $t/J> ifHit frAMttX request fA#h Ueti p/e4SC Send 4 CoM or nti thaitrio./ yfo my Currtnt address.

M) year tf&rh in HuS /n*fcr drt hujMef Mprecfakd' Ih^jz jccit ZreSeivedN JUL 2 3 2015 fapt&ffuf/uj THIRD COURT OF APPEALS.

\ JEFFREY D. KYI Ey

CL£V£L/tolb CdtZRECTlOUbL CUJTZU Po (io% 107s CL&blfrNb, TZY/B 77 ZZ 2

J? -s> r^ £ re ° C 3

r-

. ' oo ^ >v

<1 o u

2 is

(I)

i\> in

4.:.

t5'^ 3 7*

f

^

5 c? fy •>

Cf. O

5)

c-

^si c^S^ =3 0<J o *^«.

~\1

2? r^

' •< | -*

nx p

I-

c^ ?5

^ *< P ^ ">