Cedillo v. State

71 S.W.2d 878, 126 Tex. Crim. 290, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 643
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 16, 1934
DocketNo. 16399.
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 71 S.W.2d 878 (Cedillo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cedillo v. State, 71 S.W.2d 878, 126 Tex. Crim. 290, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 643 (Tex. 1934).

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge. —

Conviction for burglary; punishment, two years in the penitentiary.

In considering appellant’s motion for rehearing our attention is drawn to the fact that the appeal bond in this case, which was made and entered into after the adjournment of the trial term of the court below, is defective in that same bears the approval only of the sheriff and is not approved by the trial judge as is required by article 818, C. C. P. The lack of a sufficient bond deprives this court of its jurisdiction to pass on the merits of the case, and the original opinion herein is withdrawn, and the appeal is ordered dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Klechka v. State
429 S.W.2d 900 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1968)
Young v. State
398 S.W.2d 572 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1965)
Johnston v. State
396 S.W.2d 404 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1965)
Birdsong v. State
387 S.W.2d 404 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
71 S.W.2d 878, 126 Tex. Crim. 290, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 643, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cedillo-v-state-texcrimapp-1934.