Cedillo v. State

71 S.W.2d 878, 126 Tex. Crim. 290, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 643
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided May 16, 1934·No. No. 16399.·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge. —

Conviction for burglary; punishment, two years in the penitentiary.

In considering appellant’s motion for rehearing our attention is drawn to the fact that the appeal bond in this case, which was made and entered into after the adjournment of the trial term of the court below, is defective in that same bears the approval only of the sheriff and is not approved by the trial judge as is required by article 818, C. C. P. The lack of a sufficient bond deprives this court of its jurisdiction to pass on the merits of the case, and the original opinion herein is withdrawn, and the appeal is ordered dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cedillo v. State, 71 S.W.2d 878, 126 Tex. Crim. 290, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 643 (Tex. 1934).

71 S.W.2d 878 (Cedillo v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Klechka v. State
429 S.W.2d 900 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1968)
Young v. State
398 S.W.2d 572 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1965)
Johnston v. State
396 S.W.2d 404 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1965)
Birdsong v. State
387 S.W.2d 404 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1965)