Cedars Associates v. E.R. Brownell & Associates, Inc.
This text of 466 So. 2d 1130 (Cedars Associates v. E.R. Brownell & Associates, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
We affirm upon a finding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in striking and dismissing appellants’ counterclaim as a sanction for failure to furnish discovery. See Harless v. Kuhn, 403 So.2d 423 (Fla.1981); A.H. Robins Co. v. Devereaux, 415 So.2d 30 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), review denied, 426 So.2d 25 (Fla.1983); Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.380(b)(2)(C).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
466 So. 2d 1130, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 736, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13089, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cedars-associates-v-er-brownell-associates-inc-fladistctapp-1985.