Cedars Associates v. E.R. Brownell & Associates, Inc.
466 So. 2d 1130, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 736, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13089
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 19, 1985·No. No. 84-1028·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
We affirm upon a finding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in striking and dismissing appellants’ counterclaim as a sanction for failure to furnish discovery. See Harless v. Kuhn, 403 So.2d 423 (Fla.1981); A.H. Robins Co. v. Devereaux, 415 So.2d 30 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), review denied, 426 So.2d 25 (Fla.1983); Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.380(b)(2)(C).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cedars Associates v. E.R. Brownell & Associates, Inc., 466 So. 2d 1130, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 736, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13089 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).
466 So. 2d 1130 (Cedars Associates v. E.R. Brownell & Associates, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kranz v. Levan
602 So. 2d 668 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Braun v. Intercontinental Bank
466 So. 2d 1130 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)