Cedar Rapids National Bank v. Beckham

65 S.E. 359, 6 Ga. App. 571, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 391
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 31, 1909·No. 1970·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Powell, J.

1. In a suit by a transferee of a negotiable instrument, an indorsement thereon in the corporate name of the payee, though not accompanied by the corporate seal, is sufficient proof of the transfer, unless the indorsement be denied by a sworn plea of non est factum. Civil Code, §3705; Sheffield v. Johnson County Bank, 2 Ga. App. 221 (58 S. E. 386).

2. The plea in the present case was not sufficient to put the plaintiff to proof of the indorsement. Crockett v. Garrard, 4 Ga. App. 360 (61 S. E. 552).

3. The court erred in granting a nonsuit. Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cedar Rapids National Bank v. Beckham, 65 S.E. 359, 6 Ga. App. 571, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 391 (Ga. Ct. App. 1909).

65 S.E. 359 (Cedar Rapids National Bank v. Beckham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Spivey v. Commercial Credit Equipment Corp.
145 S.E.2d 68 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1965)
Lancaster v. Ralston
198 S.E. 839 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1938)
Odell v. Wessinger
189 S.E. 367 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)
Edwards v. Camp
116 S.E. 210 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Lightfoot v. Head & Cain
107 S.E. 609 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)
Citizens Bank v. Ware
77 S.E. 589 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)
Kirby v. Johnson County Sayings Bank
76 S.E. 996 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)