Cedar Creek Township v. Hutchinson

Indiana Supreme Court

Cedar Creek Township v. Hutchinson

64 Ind. 597

DecidedNovember 15, 1878

StatusPublished

This text of 64 Ind. 597 (Cedar Creek Township v. Hutchinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cedar Creek Township v. Hutchinson, 64 Ind. 597 (Ind. 1878).

Pincite

Opinion

Howk, C. J.

The first error assigned by the appellant on the record of this cause is as follows :

“ 1. The complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.”

And now comes the appellee, by Messrs. Coombs, Morris & Bell, his attorneys, and confesses that the foregoing error is well assigned, and that' his complaint in this case does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

The judgment is therefore reversed, at the appellee’s costs, and the cause is remanded, with leave to the appellee to amend his complaint.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Howk, C. J.

The first error assigned by the appellant on the record of this cause is as follows :

“ 1. The complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.”

And now comes the appellee, by Messrs. Coombs, Morris & Bell, his attorneys, and confesses that the foregoing error is well assigned, and that' his complaint in this case does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

The judgment is therefore reversed, at the appellee’s costs, and the cause is remanded, with leave to the appellee to amend his complaint.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

64 Ind. 597, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cedar-creek-township-v-hutchinson-ind-1878.