Cedar Bridge, L.L.C. v. MILA, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Cedar Bridge, L.L.C. v. MILA, Inc.

241 S.W.3d 365, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1654, 2007 WL 4234458

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 4, 2007

DocketED 89553

StatusPublished

This text of 241 S.W.3d 365 (Cedar Bridge, L.L.C. v. MILA, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cedar Bridge, L.L.C. v. MILA, Inc., 241 S.W.3d 365, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1654, 2007 WL 4234458 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Cedar Bridge, L.L.C. (Cedar Bridge) appeals from the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of MILA, Inc., d/b/a Mortgage Lending Associates, Inc. (MILA) on Cedar Bridge’s petition to quiet title to real property under Section 140.330. 1 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude there is no genuine dispute of the material facts and MILA is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. ITT Commercial Fin. Corp. v. Mid-Am. Marine Supply Corp., 854 S.W.2d 371, 377 (Mo. banc.1993). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

1

. All statutory references are to RSMo 2000, unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Cedar Bridge, L.L.C. (Cedar Bridge) appeals from the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of MILA, Inc., d/b/a Mortgage Lending Associates, Inc. (MILA) on Cedar Bridge’s petition to quiet title to real property under Section 140.330. 1 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude there is no genuine dispute of the material facts and MILA is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. ITT Commercial Fin. Corp. v. Mid-Am. Marine Supply Corp., 854 S.W.2d 371, 377 (Mo. banc.1993). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

1

. All statutory references are to RSMo 2000, unless otherwise indicated.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

241 S.W.3d 365, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1654, 2007 WL 4234458, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cedar-bridge-llc-v-mila-inc-moctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack