Cedano v. City of New York
415 N.E.2d 978, 51 N.Y.2d 896, 434 N.Y.S.2d 990, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2893
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order reversed, without costs, and the case remitted to the Appellate Division, First Department, for exercise of that court’s discretion. In the circumstances present here it was improper for the Appellate Division to decide the issue presented as a matter of law.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cedano v. City of New York, 415 N.E.2d 978, 51 N.Y.2d 896, 434 N.Y.S.2d 990, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2893 (N.Y. 1980).
415 N.E.2d 978 (Cedano v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Peterson v. New York City Housing Authority
190 A.D.2d 738 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
De Olden v. State
91 A.D.2d 1057 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Bay Terrace Cooperative Section IV, Inc. v. New York State Employees' Retirement System Policemen's & Firemen's Retirement System
434 N.E.2d 254 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
Cohen v. Pearl River Union Free School District
414 N.E.2d 639 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)