Cecilio v. Cecilio

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cecilio v. Cecilio

447 So. 2d 353, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12103

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 6, 1984

DocketNo. 83-1992

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 447 So. 2d 353 (Cecilio v. Cecilio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cecilio v. Cecilio, 447 So. 2d 353, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12103 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Finding that the trial court abused its discretion in failing to reconsider child support obligations, we reverse that portion of the order denying modification of child support. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980). In light of the parties’ disparate economic circumstances, the trial court erred in denying the wife reasonable attorneys’ fees. Locke v. Locke, 413 So.2d 431 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

Appellant’s other points are without merit.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Finding that the trial court abused its discretion in failing to reconsider child support obligations, we reverse that portion of the order denying modification of child support. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980). In light of the parties’ disparate economic circumstances, the trial court erred in denying the wife reasonable attorneys’ fees. Locke v. Locke, 413 So.2d 431 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

Appellant’s other points are without merit.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

447 So. 2d 353, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cecilio-v-cecilio-fladistctapp-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack