Cecilio v. Cecilio

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cecilio v. Cecilio

447 So. 2d 353, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12103

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 6, 1984·No. No. 83-1992·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Finding that the trial court abused its discretion in failing to reconsider child support obligations, we reverse that portion of the order denying modification of child support. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980). In light of the parties’ disparate economic circumstances, the trial court erred in denying the wife reasonable attorneys’ fees. Locke v. Locke, 413 So.2d 431 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

Appellant’s other points are without merit.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Finding that the trial court abused its discretion in failing to reconsider child support obligations, we reverse that portion of the order denying modification of child support. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980). In light of the parties’ disparate economic circumstances, the trial court erred in denying the wife reasonable attorneys’ fees. Locke v. Locke, 413 So.2d 431 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

Appellant’s other points are without merit.

Reversed and remanded.

Cecilio v. Cecilio, 447 So. 2d 353, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12103 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

447 So. 2d 353 (Cecilio v. Cecilio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related