Cecilio Tamayo Contreras v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.
This text of 539 F. App'x 698 (Cecilio Tamayo Contreras v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
El Salvadoran citizens Cecilio Tamayo Contreras and Eva Yolanda Tamayo petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), which upheld an immigration judge’s (I J’s) denial of special rule cancellation of removal under the Nicaraguan and Central American Relief Act. After careful consideration, we conclude that petitioners’ arguments regarding Contreras’s eligibility for special rule cancellation of removal are unreviewable. See Molina Jerez v. Holder, 625 F.3d 1058, 1068-69 (8th Cir.2010). We further conclude that factual errors mistakenly included in the IJ’s written decision — which the BIA corrected — do not warrant a remand. See United States v. Timley, 507 F.3d 1125, 1131 (8th Cir.2007) (declining to remand case where it would be futile and waste of judicial resources).
Accordingly, we deny the petition. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
539 F. App'x 698, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cecilio-tamayo-contreras-v-eric-h-holder-jr-ca8-2013.