Cecilio Tamayo Contreras v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.

539 F. App'x 698
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided November 8, 2013·No. 13-1101·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

El Salvadoran citizens Cecilio Tamayo Contreras and Eva Yolanda Tamayo petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), which upheld an immigration judge’s (I J’s) denial of special rule cancellation of removal under the Nicaraguan and Central American Relief Act. After careful consideration, we conclude that petitioners’ arguments regarding Contreras’s eligibility for special rule cancellation of removal are unreviewable. See Molina Jerez v. Holder, 625 F.3d 1058, 1068-69 (8th Cir.2010). We further conclude that factual errors mistakenly included in the IJ’s written decision — which the BIA corrected — do not warrant a remand. See United States v. Timley, 507 F.3d 1125, 1131 (8th Cir.2007) (declining to remand case where it would be futile and waste of judicial resources).

Accordingly, we deny the petition. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cecilio Tamayo Contreras v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., 539 F. App'x 698 (8th Cir. 2013).

539 F. App'x 698 (Cecilio Tamayo Contreras v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Molina Jerez v. Holder
625 F.3d 1058 (Eighth Circuit, 2010)
United States v. Timley
507 F.3d 1125 (Eighth Circuit, 2007)