Cecilio Hernandez and Christina Hernandez v. Hector X. Zuniga D/B/A Z & R Investments
This text of Cecilio Hernandez and Christina Hernandez v. Hector X. Zuniga D/B/A Z & R Investments (Cecilio Hernandez and Christina Hernandez v. Hector X. Zuniga D/B/A Z & R Investments) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Alma L. López, Chief Justice
Catherine Stone, Justice
Karen Angelini, Justice
Delivered and Filed: October 10, 2007
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION
On August 20, 2007, we ordered appellants to provide written proof to this court that either: (1) the clerk's fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the clerk's fee; or (2) appellants are entitled to appeal without paying the clerk's fee. Appellants have failed to respond to this order. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(c). Costs of appeal are taxed against appellants.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Cecilio Hernandez and Christina Hernandez v. Hector X. Zuniga D/B/A Z & R Investments, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cecilio-hernandez-and-christina-hernandez-v-hector-texapp-2007.