Cecile J. Shapiro v. Russell Leach, Bernard Chupka, Sidney Golden, and Ted Hysell

330 F.2d 617, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 5534
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedApril 28, 1964
Docket15557_1
StatusPublished

This text of 330 F.2d 617 (Cecile J. Shapiro v. Russell Leach, Bernard Chupka, Sidney Golden, and Ted Hysell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cecile J. Shapiro v. Russell Leach, Bernard Chupka, Sidney Golden, and Ted Hysell, 330 F.2d 617, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 5534 (6th Cir. 1964).

Opinion

ORDER.

Upon consideration of the appeal, the Court finds that there is no error in the proceedings and judgment of the District Court,

It is, therefore, ordered that the judgment of the District Court be and hereby is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
330 F.2d 617, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 5534, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cecile-j-shapiro-v-russell-leach-bernard-chupka-sidney-golden-and-ted-ca6-1964.