Cecil v. United States

225 F. 368, 140 C.C.A. 392, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2107
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided June 23, 1915·No. No. 4338·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Cecil was tried, convicted, and sentenced in the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Oklahoma for introducing and carrying into' the Indian country, to wit, the county of Muskogee, in the state of Oklahoma, from without said Indian country, and from without said district, spirituous and intoxi[369] eating liquor. At tlie close of all the evidence offered at the trial, counsel for the defendant demurred to the evidence introduced, for the reason that it failed to show the defendant guilty as charged. The demurrer was overruled, and an exception taken.

We are of the opinion that the demurrer ought to have been sustained, as there was not sufficient evidence that the defendant introduced intoxicating liquor into Muskogee county from without the district or state of Oklahoma. Chambliss v. United States, 218 Fed. 154, 132 C. C. A. 112; Lewellen v. United States, 223 Fed. 18, - C. C. A. —; Moore v. United States, 224 Fed. 95, — C. C. A. —; Sellers v. United States, 222 Fed. 1023, - C. C. A. ——; Crites v. United States, 222 Fed. 1022, — C. C. A. -.

The judgment below is reversed, and a new trial ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cecil v. United States, 225 F. 368, 140 C.C.A. 392, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2107 (8th Cir. 1915).

225 F. 368 (Cecil v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Parks v. United States
225 F. 369 (Eighth Circuit, 1915)
Collins v. United States
225 F. 365 (Eighth Circuit, 1915)
Talkington v. United States
225 F. 367 (Eighth Circuit, 1915)