Cecil v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Cecil v. State

83 S.W.2d 990, 129 Tex. Crim. 86, 1935 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 358

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided May 8, 1935·No. No. 17556.·Published

Opinion

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for burglary, punishment being ten years in the penitentiary.

This is a companion case to No. * 17,555, Morrow v. State, this day affirmed. The record is practicaly identical in the two cases. We were at some pains to set out the evidence in Morrow’s case upon which the disposition of the appeal turned and it is not necessary to repeat it. The same questions of law arise here as is in that case, and our affirmance of the Morrow case calls for the same action here.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Morrow, P. J., absent.

*

(Page 117 of this volume).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for burglary, punishment being ten years in the penitentiary.

This is a companion case to No. * 17,555, Morrow v. State, this day affirmed. The record is practicaly identical in the two cases. We were at some pains to set out the evidence in Morrow’s case upon which the disposition of the appeal turned and it is not necessary to repeat it. The same questions of law arise here as is in that case, and our affirmance of the Morrow case calls for the same action here.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Morrow, P. J., absent.

*

(Page 117 of this volume).

Cecil v. State, 83 S.W.2d 990, 129 Tex. Crim. 86, 1935 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 358 (Tex. 1935).

Pincite

83 S.W.2d 990 (Cecil v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.