Cecil v. State

611 So. 2d 584, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13594, 1992 WL 389249
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cecil v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 596 So. 2d 461
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 31, 1992·No. No. 92-1765·Published

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

Appellee, the State of Florida, has moved for rehearing of this court’s opinion dated November 24, 1992, affirming the imposition on Glinder Lee Cecil of an habitual felony offender sentence, pursuant to section 775.084(1)(a), Florida Statutes, but certifying the questions certified in Tillman v. State, 586 So.2d 1269 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). The motion is granted. The opinion herein dated November 24, 1992 is withdrawn, and the following opinion is substituted therefor.

Glinder Lee Cecil has appealed from an order of the trial court sentencing her as an habitual felony offender, arguing that section 775.084(l)(a) violates double jeopardy because of its focus on the character of prior offenses. We affirm. See Tillman v. State, 586 So.2d 1269 (Fla. 1st DCA), approved 609 So.2d 1295 (Fla.1992).

JOANOS, C.J., and SHIVERS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cecil v. State, 611 So. 2d 584, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13594, 1992 WL 389249 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

611 So. 2d 584 (Cecil v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tillman v. State
609 So. 2d 1295 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)
Tillman v. State
586 So. 2d 1269 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)