Cecil v. City of Jacksonville
800 P.2d 1090, 104 Or. App. 526, 1990 Ore. App. LEXIS 1658
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedDecember 5, 1990
DocketLUBA 90-013; CA A66579
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 800 P.2d 1090 (Cecil v. City of Jacksonville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cecil v. City of Jacksonville, 800 P.2d 1090, 104 Or. App. 526, 1990 Ore. App. LEXIS 1658 (Or. Ct. App. 1990).
Opinion
Petitioners seek review of a LUBA decision. Respondent city has moved to dismiss the petition and, alternatively, to strike petitioners’ assignments of error. The motions are denied.
On the merits, we affirm without discussion.
Motions to dismiss and to strike denied; affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Schatz v. City of Jacksonville
835 P.2d 923 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1992)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
800 P.2d 1090, 104 Or. App. 526, 1990 Ore. App. LEXIS 1658, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cecil-v-city-of-jacksonville-orctapp-1990.