Cecil Tiner v. State of Alabama
510 F.2d 1363, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 15339
Opinion
The summary judgment rendered below is vacated and this cause remanded for a hearing to determine whether the appellant deliberately bypassed his state remedies. Should the district court find that appellant did not deliberately bypass such remedies, the constitutional questions presented by the appellant’s petition for habeas corpus warrant a full hearing on the merits.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cecil Tiner v. State of Alabama, 510 F.2d 1363, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 15339 (5th Cir. 1975).
510 F.2d 1363 (Cecil Tiner v. State of Alabama) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, Defendant-Third Party v. Marine Mart, Inc., Third Party
431 F.2d 409 (Third Circuit, 1970)