Cecil Tiner v. State of Alabama

510 F.2d 1363, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 15339
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedApril 3, 1975
Docket74-3835
StatusPublished

This text of 510 F.2d 1363 (Cecil Tiner v. State of Alabama) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cecil Tiner v. State of Alabama, 510 F.2d 1363, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 15339 (5th Cir. 1975).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The summary judgment rendered below is vacated and this cause remanded for a hearing to determine whether the appellant deliberately bypassed his state remedies. Should the district court find that appellant did not deliberately bypass such remedies, the constitutional questions presented by the appellant’s petition for habeas corpus warrant a full hearing on the merits.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
510 F.2d 1363, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 15339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cecil-tiner-v-state-of-alabama-ca5-1975.