Cecil McDonald v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 7, 2012
Docket07-12-00512-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Cecil McDonald v. State (Cecil McDonald v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cecil McDonald v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

NO. 07-12-00512-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DECEMBER 7, 2012 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CECIL MCDONALD, A/K/A CECIL TRIMBLE, APPELLANT

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FROM THE 364TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

NO. 2000-434,614; HONORABLE BRADLEY S. UNDERWOOD, JUDGE --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Cecil McDonald, filed an "Application for a Certificate of Appealability" with the trial court on November 26, 2012. In this application, appellant seeks to appeal his 2001 conviction for murder on the basis that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. The direct appeal of the trial court's 2001 judgment was resolved by this Court's opinion and judgment of August 29, 2007. See McDonald v. State, No. 07-06-0276-CR, 2007 Tex.App. LEXIS 7139 (Tex.App. -- Amarillo Aug. 29, 2007, pet. ref'd). Following denial of appellant's petition for discretionary review by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, see In re Trimble, No. PD-1435-07, 2008 Tex.Crim.App. 45 (Tex.Crim.App. Jan. 16, 2008) (decision without published opinion), mandate was issued on May 15, 2008. This Court's plenary power expired 60 days after judgment. Tex. R. App. P. 19.1(a). As a result, this Court does not have jurisdiction over appellant's attempted appeal. Because this Court is without plenary power over this appeal, no further action may be taken by this Court in this proceeding and the appeal is hereby dismissed.

Mackey K. Hancock Justice

Do not publish.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Cecil McDonald v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cecil-mcdonald-v-state-texapp-2012.