Ceccotti v. Nationwide Insurance

466 A.2d 618, 502 Pa. 353, 1983 Pa. LEXIS 697
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedOctober 21, 1983
StatusPublished

This text of 466 A.2d 618 (Ceccotti v. Nationwide Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ceccotti v. Nationwide Insurance, 466 A.2d 618, 502 Pa. 353, 1983 Pa. LEXIS 697 (Pa. 1983).

Opinion

OPINION

LARSEN, Justice.

Appellant, Amiel Ceccotti, was injured in a motor vehicle accident while operating a tractor-trailer in the course of his employment. As a result of the accident and bodily injuries he suffered, appellant was unable to work for a period of ten weeks. At the time of the accident, appellant was earning $577.00 a week. During his ten-week period of disability, he received workmen’s compensation payments in the sum of $227.00 a week. Appellant applied for work loss benefits to his personal no-fault insurance carrier, appellee Nationwide Insurance Company. His application was denied. Appellant then filed suit in assumpsit against appellee seeking recovery of the no-fault benefits for which he applied. The lower court held that appellant was entitled to work loss benefits in the amount of the difference between the workmen’s compensation benefits he received ($227.00 a week) and the maximum no-fault benefit ($232.00 a week) provided for by the No-Fault Motor Vehicle Insurance Act.1 Summary judgment in the amount of $50.00 was granted in favor of appellant and against the appellee.2 In a memorandum opinion, the Superior Court affirmed the lower court’s or[355]*355der.3 We granted appellant’s petition for allowance of appeal.

Based upon and for the reasons set forth in our opinion and decision in Motley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 502 Pa. 335, 466 A.2d 609 (1983), the order of the Superior Court is reversed and the case is remanded to the trial court for proceedings consistent with this result.

NIX, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Motley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
466 A.2d 609 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
466 A.2d 618, 502 Pa. 353, 1983 Pa. LEXIS 697, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ceccotti-v-nationwide-insurance-pa-1983.