Cecarino v. Glenlyon Dye Works

1 Super. Ct. (R.I.) 37
CourtSuperior Court of Rhode Island
DecidedJanuary 12, 1918
DocketPet.No.166 W.C.Act
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Super. Ct. (R.I.) 37 (Cecarino v. Glenlyon Dye Works) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cecarino v. Glenlyon Dye Works, 1 Super. Ct. (R.I.) 37 (R.I. Ct. App. 1918).

Opinion

TANNER, P. J.

We are of the opinion that the petitioner is entitled to compensation in accordance with the Act and that he should submit to an operation, which will probably restore his hand so that he may resume work, and that six weeks is a probable time required for said operation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Super. Ct. (R.I.) 37, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cecarino-v-glenlyon-dye-works-risuperct-1918.