Cecarino v. Glenlyon Dye Works

1 Super. Ct. (R.I.) 37
Superior Court of Rhode Island·Decided January 12, 1918·No. Pet.No.166 W.C.Act·Published

Opinion

TANNER, P. J.

We are of the opinion that the petitioner is entitled to compensation in accordance with the Act and that he should submit to an operation, which will probably restore his hand so that he may resume work, and that six weeks is a probable time required for said operation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cecarino v. Glenlyon Dye Works, 1 Super. Ct. (R.I.) 37 (R.I. Ct. App. 1918).

1 Super. Ct. (R.I.) 37 (Cecarino v. Glenlyon Dye Works) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.