Ceballos-Ramirez v. Lynch
This text of 670 F. App'x 536 (Ceballos-Ramirez v. Lynch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Luis Carlos Ceballos-Ramirez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review [537]*537of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reconsider its denial of a motion to reopen removal proceedings to seek administrative closure. We dismiss the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s denial of Ceballos-Ramirez’s motion to reconsider its underlying discretionary decision regarding administrative closure. See Diaz-Covarrubias v. Mukasey, 551 F.3d 1114, 1120 (9th Cir. 2009) (this court lacks jurisdiction to review the denial of administrative closure for lack of a sufficiently meaningful standard to evaluate the decision); Vilchiz-Soto v. Holder, 688 F.3d 642, 644 (9th Cir. 2012) (limiting the court’s jurisdiction to review the BIA’s denial of a motion to reconsider its underling discretionary determination).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
670 F. App'x 536, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ceballos-ramirez-v-lynch-ca9-2016.