Ceasco, Inc. v. Byrom

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Ceasco, Inc. v. Byrom

895 So. 2d 949, 2004 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 620, 2004 WL 1802046

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ceasco, Inc. v. Byrom. Read the opinion of the Court — 2002 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 822 →

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama·Decided August 13, 2004·No. 2010541·Published

Opinion

On Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court

CRAWLEY, Judge.

This court’s prior judgment has been reversed and the cause remanded by the Alabama Supreme Court. Ex parte Byrom, 895 So.2d 942, 949 (Ala.2004). In compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion, the trial court’s judgment awarding workers’ compensation benefits to Byrom is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

YATES, P.J., and THOMPSON, PITTMAN, and MURDOCK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court

CRAWLEY, Judge.

This court’s prior judgment has been reversed and the cause remanded by the Alabama Supreme Court. Ex parte Byrom, 895 So.2d 942, 949 (Ala.2004). In compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion, the trial court’s judgment awarding workers’ compensation benefits to Byrom is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

YATES, P.J., and THOMPSON, PITTMAN, and MURDOCK, JJ., concur.

Ceasco, Inc. v. Byrom, 895 So. 2d 949, 2004 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 620, 2004 WL 1802046 (Ala. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

895 So. 2d 949 (Ceasco, Inc. v. Byrom) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related