Ceasar v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Ceasar v. State

74 S.E. 709, 11 Ga. App. 102, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 276

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 16, 1912

Docket4087

StatusPublished

This text of 74 S.E. 709 (Ceasar v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ceasar v. State, 74 S.E. 709, 11 Ga. App. 102, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 276 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

1. As to the special assignments of error this ease is fully controlled by the decision in Lewis v. State, ante, 102 (74 S. E. 708).

2. The judge presented to the jury clearly and fully all the material issues made by the evidence, and the excerpts from, the charge objected to in the amended motion for a new trial contain no material error. The evidence supports the verdict, and no reason appears why another trial should be granted, ' Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill, C. J.

1. As to the special assignments of error this ease is fully controlled by the decision in Lewis v. State, ante, 102 (74 S. E. 708).

2. The judge presented to the jury clearly and fully all the material issues made by the evidence, and the excerpts from, the charge objected to in the amended motion for a new trial contain no material error. The evidence supports the verdict, and no reason appears why another trial should be granted, ' Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

74 S.E. 709, 11 Ga. App. 102, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 276, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ceasar-v-state-gactapp-1912.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack