CDS Holdings I, Inc. v. Shutts & Bowen, L.L.P.

199 So. 3d 303, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 10353
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 6, 2016·No. Nos. 3D14-3119, 3D15-40·Published

Opinion

SALTER, J.

Finding no abuse of discretion by the trial court regarding the rulings challenged by the appellants, we affirm the final judgment and denial of the post-trial motions. Fla. Dep’t of Revenue v. Cummings, 930 So.2d 604 (Fla.2006); Roberts v. Tejada, 814 So.2d 334 (Fla.2002).

On the cross-appeal from the denial of attorney’s fees based on the appellees’ proposal for settlement, we also affirm. Audiffred v. Arnold, 161 So.3d 1274 (Fla.2015).

Affirmed as to each of the consolidated appeals, case nos. 3D15-40 and 3D14-3119.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CDS Holdings I, Inc. v. Shutts & Bowen, L.L.P., 199 So. 3d 303, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 10353 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

199 So. 3d 303 (CDS Holdings I, Inc. v. Shutts & Bowen, L.L.P.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Roberts Ex Rel. Estate of Roberts v. Tejada
814 So. 2d 334 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2002)
Florida Dept. of Revenue v. Cummings
930 So. 2d 604 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2006)
Valerie Audiffred v. Thomas B. Arnold
161 So. 3d 1274 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2015)