CDC Capital Invs., LLC v. MTGLQ Investors, L.P.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

CDC Capital Invs., LLC v. MTGLQ Investors, L.P.

260 So. 3d 1187

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 31, 2018

DocketNo. 1D17-3896

StatusPublished

This text of 260 So. 3d 1187 (CDC Capital Invs., LLC v. MTGLQ Investors, L.P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

CDC Capital Invs., LLC v. MTGLQ Investors, L.P., 260 So. 3d 1187 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Because Appellant has failed to file the transcript of the bench trial and failed to carry its burden of showing reversible error, we affirm the final judgment. The lack of an adequate record of the proceedings below prevents us from determining whether the trial court abused its discretion in admitting evidence at trial. Therefore, we must affirm. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee , 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979).

AFFIRMED.

Wetherell, Bilbrey, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Because Appellant has failed to file the transcript of the bench trial and failed to carry its burden of showing reversible error, we affirm the final judgment. The lack of an adequate record of the proceedings below prevents us from determining whether the trial court abused its discretion in admitting evidence at trial. Therefore, we must affirm. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee , 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979).

AFFIRMED.

Wetherell, Bilbrey, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

260 So. 3d 1187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cdc-capital-invs-llc-v-mtglq-investors-lp-fladistctapp-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack