C.D. v. Juvenile Officer

Missouri Court of Appeals

C.D. v. Juvenile Officer

387 S.W.3d 452, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 6, 2013 WL 11710

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 2, 2013·No. No. WD 75071·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

C.D. (“Mother”) appeals the trial court’s judgment terminating her parental rights. Mother contends that the court erred in that: (1) it did not make a specific finding, pursuant to section 211.447.7, that the termination of her parental rights was in the best interest of her children, and (2) the evidence would not support a finding that termination was in the best interest of the children. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum explaining our decision has been provided to the parties.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

C.D. (“Mother”) appeals the trial court’s judgment terminating her parental rights. Mother contends that the court erred in that: (1) it did not make a specific finding, pursuant to section 211.447.7, that the termination of her parental rights was in the best interest of her children, and (2) the evidence would not support a finding that termination was in the best interest of the children. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum explaining our decision has been provided to the parties.

C.D. v. Juvenile Officer, 387 S.W.3d 452, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 6, 2013 WL 11710 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

387 S.W.3d 452 (C.D. v. Juvenile Officer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.