Ccs Technology, Inc. v. Panduit Corp.

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

CCS TECHNOLOGY, INC., Appellant

v.

PANDUIT CORP., Appellee ______________________

2019-1286, 2019-1287 ______________________

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2017- 01323, IPR2017-01375. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

JOHN C. O'QUINN, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by HANNAH LAUREN BEDARD, JASON M. WILCOX; ERIC DAVID HAYES, Chicago, IL.

JOHN J. MOLENDA, Steptoe & Johnson, LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellee. Also represented by ROBERT GREENFELD; KELLY J. EBERSPECHER, DANIEL STEVEN STRINGFIELD, Chicago, IL; KATHERINE DOROTHY CAPPAERT, Washington, DC. _____________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, DYK and WALLACH, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

December 11, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court