C.C. v. State

818 So. 2d 671, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 8216, 2002 WL 1285157
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in C.C. v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 4803
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 12, 2002·No. No. 3D01-3308·Published

Opinion

SHEVIN, Judge.

We reverse the adjudication finding the juvenile guilty of willfully interrupting or disturbing a school, under section 871.01, Fla. Stat. (2001). The state did not establish that the juvenile “deliberately acted to create a disturbance.” S.H.B. v. State, 355 So.2d 1176, 1179 (Fla.1977). Nothing in the record would support a finding that the juvenile acted “with the intention that his behavior impede the successful functioning” of the school or that he acted [672]*672“with reckless disregard of the effect of his behavior.” Id.

Reversed and remanded with instructions to enter a judgment of acquittal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

C.C. v. State, 818 So. 2d 671, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 8216, 2002 WL 1285157 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

818 So. 2d 671 (C.C. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

S.H.B. v. State
355 So. 2d 1176 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1977)