C.C. v. Bartow County School District
This text of 418 F. App'x 826 (C.C. v. Bartow County School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellants/Plaintiffs C.C. and his mother Lisa Coleman appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment for Appellee/Defendant Bartow County School District on their Title IX claims of sexual discrimination. The Plaintiffs contend that they have put on sufficient evidence to [827]*827create genuine issues of material fact for all elements of their Title IX claim.
After reviewing the record, reading the parties’ briefs, and having the benefit of oral argument, we conclude that the district court correctly held that the Plaintiffs failed to create a genuine issue of material fact whether C.C. suffered discrimination “so severe, pervasive, and objectively offensive that it effectively bar[red his] access to an educational opportunity or benefit.” Davis Next Friend LaShonda D. v. Monroe County Bd. Of Educ., 526 U.S. 629, 650, 119 S.Ct. 1661, 1675 (1999). Therefore, we affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Defendants.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
418 F. App'x 826, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cc-v-bartow-county-school-district-ca11-2011.