CBS, Inc. v. Liederman
This text of 44 F.3d 174 (CBS, Inc. v. Liederman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm for substantially the reasons stated by Judge Duffy. See CBS, Inc. v. Liederman, 866 F.Supp. 763 (S.D.N.Y.1994). We add only that the sole issue resolved concerns the use of the name “Television City” for a restaurant in New York City. Because of the fact-specific nature of the issues and the need for a record posing these issues in a concrete fashion, we do not address the propriety of the use of that name in other commercial or geographic contexts. Specifically, we do not address the marketing of memorabilia or other items bearing the name or the opening of a second restaurant in Los Angeles.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
44 F.3d 174, 1995 WL 30899, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cbs-inc-v-liederman-ca2-1995.