CBR Restaurant Supplies, Inc. v. Carfel, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

CBR Restaurant Supplies, Inc. v. Carfel, Inc.

685 So. 2d 45, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12821, 1996 WL 709357

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 11, 1996

DocketNos. 96-275, 95-3651

StatusPublished

This text of 685 So. 2d 45 (CBR Restaurant Supplies, Inc. v. Carfel, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

CBR Restaurant Supplies, Inc. v. Carfel, Inc., 685 So. 2d 45, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12821, 1996 WL 709357 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In view of the fact that the record reflects a disputed issue of material fact concerning the identity of the manufacturer of the meat grinder in question, it was error for the trial court to grant the Motion for Summary Judgment that the appellee filed against the plaintiff below.¹ As a result thereof, it was also error to grant the Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings that was filed by the appel-lee against the appellant herein, since the granting of the latter motion was predicated on the granting of the former motion. Accordingly, this cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In view of the fact that the record reflects a disputed issue of material fact concerning the identity of the manufacturer of the meat grinder in question, it was error for the trial court to grant the Motion for Summary Judgment that the appellee filed against the plaintiff below.¹ As a result thereof, it was also error to grant the Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings that was filed by the appel-lee against the appellant herein, since the granting of the latter motion was predicated on the granting of the former motion. Accordingly, this cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

685 So. 2d 45, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12821, 1996 WL 709357, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cbr-restaurant-supplies-inc-v-carfel-inc-fladistctapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack