C.B. v. State

973 So. 2d 1285, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 2181
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 20, 2008·No. No. 4D07-2137·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

MAY, J.

A juvenile appeals a disposition order entered following an adjudicatory hearing on the charge of resisting an officer without violence. He argues that the order must be reversed because he was represented by a certified legal intern, but the record does not contain an executed written consent form verifying his acceptance of representation by the intern. We agree and reverse.

In R.M. v. State, 664 So.2d 42, 43 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995), we held that the lack of a written consent to representation by a certified legal intern is fatal. See also L.R. v. State, 698 So.2d 915, 916 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (reversing an adjudication because the written consent form contained the wrong name of the certified legal intern); M.C. v. State, 687 So.2d 832, 833 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (reversing an adjudication because the juvenile did not execute a written waiver of his right to be represented by an attorney). The outcome here must be the same even though it appears that the supervising attorney was present and actively participated in the defense of the juvenile.

Reversed and remanded.

STONE and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

C.B. v. State, 973 So. 2d 1285, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 2181 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

973 So. 2d 1285 (C.B. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

C. C. J. v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019
Reigelsperger v. State
16 So. 3d 942 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)