C.B. v. DCF
This text of C.B. v. DCF (C.B. v. DCF) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
C.B., MOTHER OF R.N., A CHILD,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D16-1147
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed September 7, 2016
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Timothy R. Shea, Judge.
Aaron S. Baghdadi, of Baghdadi Law P.A., Longwood, for Appellant.
Derek J. Angell, of O'Connor & O'Connor, LLC, Winter Park, for Guardian ad Litem.
Rosemarie Farrell, of Children's Legal Services, Orlando, for Appellee, Florida Department of Children and Families.
PER CURIAM.
C.B., mother of R.N., appeals the trial court’s order terminating her parental rights
as to R.N. We affirm the order of termination based on section 39.806(1)(e), Florida
Statutes (2015). See C.S. v. Dep’t of Child. & Fams., 178 So. 3d 937, 940 (Fla. 4th DCA
2015) (recognizing that an appellate court will affirm the order terminating parental rights if "upon the pleadings and evidence before the trial court, there is any theory or principle
of law which would support the trial court's judgment in favor of terminating . . . parental
rights." (quoting D.G. v. Dep't of Child. & Fams., 77 So. 3d 201, 206-07 (Fla. 4th DCA
2011))). However, because the record reflects that, absent a period of one month, C.B.
regularly visited with the child, provided some toys and clothing items for the child, and
the child appeared happy to see C.B. during the scheduled visits, we reverse as to the
finding of abandonment under sections 39.01(1) and 39.806(1)(b), Florida Statutes
(2015), and remand for modification of the order. See J.L. v. Dep't of Child. & Fams., 143
So. 3d 1158, 1158 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014) (citing S.L. v. Dep't of Child. & Fams., 120 So. 3d
75, 77 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013)); see also A.S. v. Dep't of Child. & Fams., 162 So. 3d 335,
339 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (citing § 39.01(1), Fla. Stat. (2014)).
AFFIRMED, in part, REVERSED, in part, and REMANDED.
LAWSON, CJ., EVANDER and BERGER, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
C.B. v. DCF, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cb-v-dcf-fladistctapp-2016.