Cazarez v. T&T 130 Pizza Corp.

S.D. New York

Cazarez v. T&T 130 Pizza Corp.

DecidedMarch 31, 2025

Docket1:20-cv-05545

StatusUnknown

This text of Cazarez v. T&T 130 Pizza Corp. (Cazarez v. T&T 130 Pizza Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cazarez v. T&T 130 Pizza Corp., (S.D.N.Y. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MARCOSCAZAREZ, SSS

Plaintiff, 20 CIVIL 5545 (RA) -against- JUDGMENT T&T 130 PIZZA CORP. (d/b/a BELLA NAPOLI) and TONY RUSSO,, Defendants. pone eK It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated March 31, 2025, the Court accordingly adopts Judge Moses's Report in its entirety. Consistent with the Report, Plaintiff shall be awarded against Defendants, jointly and severally: $122,271.48 in damages; $4,725 in attorneys’ fees; $400 in costs; and prejudgment interest at a rate of $15.07 per day from October 20, 2017 to the date of entry of judgment, amounting to $40,975.33 ($15.07 x 2,719 days). In total, Plaintiff shall be awarded $168,371.81. Finally, the parties' failure to timely object to the Report "operates as a waiver" and precludes appellate review of this decision. Kashelkar v. Vill. of Spring Valley, 320 F. App'x 53, 54 (2d Cir. 2009) (summary order) (citing DeLeon v. Strack, 234 F.3d 84, 86 (2d Cir. 2000)); see also ECF No. 32, at 26 ("Failure to file timely objections will result in a waiver of such objections and will preclude appellate review."). Dated: New York, New York March 31, 2025 TAMMI M. HELLWIG Clerk of Court BY: TR Deputy Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MARCOSCAZAREZ, SSS

Plaintiff, 20 CIVIL 5545 (RA) -against- JUDGMENT T&T 130 PIZZA CORP. (d/b/a BELLA NAPOLI) and TONY RUSSO,, Defendants. pone eK It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated March 31, 2025, the Court accordingly adopts Judge Moses's Report in its entirety. Consistent with the Report, Plaintiff shall be awarded against Defendants, jointly and severally: $122,271.48 in damages; $4,725 in attorneys’ fees; $400 in costs; and prejudgment interest at a rate of $15.07 per day from October 20, 2017 to the date of entry of judgment, amounting to $40,975.33 ($15.07 x 2,719 days). In total, Plaintiff shall be awarded $168,371.81. Finally, the parties' failure to timely object to the Report "operates as a waiver" and precludes appellate review of this decision. Kashelkar v. Vill. of Spring Valley, 320 F. App'x 53, 54 (2d Cir. 2009) (summary order) (citing DeLeon v. Strack, 234 F.3d 84, 86 (2d Cir. 2000)); see also ECF No. 32, at 26 ("Failure to file timely objections will result in a waiver of such objections and will preclude appellate review."). Dated: New York, New York March 31, 2025 TAMMI M. HELLWIG Clerk of Court BY: TR Deputy Clerk

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Cazarez v. T&T 130 Pizza Corp., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cazarez-v-tt-130-pizza-corp-nysd-2025.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack