Cayuga Lake R.R. Co. v. . Kyle

64 N.Y. 185, 1876 N.Y. LEXIS 51
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 8, 1876
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 64 N.Y. 185 (Cayuga Lake R.R. Co. v. . Kyle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cayuga Lake R.R. Co. v. . Kyle, 64 N.Y. 185, 1876 N.Y. LEXIS 51 (N.Y. 1876).

Opinion

Rapallo, J.

This action is brought to recover from the defendant a balance remaining unpaid upon a subscription made by him in June, 1867, for ten shares, of $100 each, of the capital stock of the plaintiff.

The defendant signed the original articles of association, in which the then proposed railroad was described as intended to be constructed from “ the Hew York Central Railroad to *187 Ithaca, the length of said railroad to be thirty-seven miles.” The articles were duly acknowledged and hied, the company was, in fact, organized under them, officers elected, and the railroad constructed and put in operation, and calls made upon the subscribers for payment of their subscriptions; and the corporate existence of the company was recognized by the legislature by an act passed April 24, 1869. (Laws of 1869, chap. 314.)

The defence set up by the defendant is, that the articles of association were defective in not distinctly stating the termini of the road, nor the counties through which it passed.

The defendant’s subscription entitled him to the shares for which he had subscribed; and by the acts of his associates in going on and locating and constructing the road, and putting it in operation, and by the legislative recognition of its corporate existence, by the act of April 24, 1869, these shares became shares in a corporation de faeto, notwithstanding the defect in the original articles. Through his act, and that of his associates, in entering into the articles of association, this corporation was formed, and has assumed to exercise the franchises and functions of a regularly constituted railroad company under the act of 1850 (chap. 140), and it has received legislative recognition as such. It appears to have obtained sufficient credit to build its road and set it in operation. The defendant has received all that he contracted for, and no good reason is shown why he should be relieved from the obligation of paying for his shares. The case of The Buffalo and Allegany Railroad Company (26 N. Y., 75) is, we think, decisive of all the questions raised by the appellant.

The judgment should be affirmed.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Corning v. Lehigh Valley Railroad
14 A.D.2d 156 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1961)
Lippman v. Kehoe Stenograph Co.
102 A. 988 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1918)
Geneva Mineral Spring Co. v. Coursey
45 A.D. 268 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
64 N.Y. 185, 1876 N.Y. LEXIS 51, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cayuga-lake-rr-co-v-kyle-ny-1876.