Caylus v. . the New York, Kingston and Syracuse Rd. Co.

76 N.Y. 609, 1879 N.Y. LEXIS 570
New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 18, 1879·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 611

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 612

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 613 EARL, J., reads for affirmance.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Caylus v. . the New York, Kingston and Syracuse Rd. Co., 76 N.Y. 609, 1879 N.Y. LEXIS 570 (N.Y. 1879).

76 N.Y. 609 (Caylus v. . the New York, Kingston and Syracuse Rd. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ebenreiter v. Woulf
1 N.W.2d 73 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1941)
Hellstern v. Hellstern
18 N.E.2d 296 (New York Court of Appeals, 1938)
Bank of Williamsville v. Amherst Motor Sales, Inc.
234 A.D. 261 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1932)
People ex rel. Rayland Realty Co. v. Fagan
194 A.D. 185 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1920)
Kahn v. Witkoski
115 N.Y.S. 138 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909)
Barth v. Loeffelholtz
84 N.W. 846 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1901)
Roome v. Collins
2 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 54 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1884)