Caylor v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION JEFFREY CAYLOR, Plaintiff, Case No: 6:19-cv-1990-YY v. COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. ORDER Upon consideration of the parties’ Stipulation for Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. 2412(d), It is hereby ORDERED that the stipulation is granted. Defendant shall pay attorney’s fees to Plaintiff pursuant to the EAJA in the amount of Four Thousand Three Hundred Dollars ($4,300.00). Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct 2521, 2528-29 (2010), EAJA fees awarded by this Court belong to Plaintiff and are subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program (31 U.S.C. §3716(c)(3)(B) (2006)). If after receiving the Court’s EAJA fee order, the Commissioner determines upon effectuation of the Court’s EAJA fee order that Plaintiff does not owe a debt that is subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program, the fees will be made payable to Plaintiff’s attorney. However, if there is a debt owed that is subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program, any remaining EAJA fees after offset will be paid by a check payable to Plaintiff but delivered to Plaintiff’s attorney. Dated: May 21, 2021 ____/_s_/ _Y_o_u_l_e_e _Y_i_m_ _Y_o_u_ _________________ United States Magistrate Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Caylor v. Commissioner Social Security Administration (Caylor v. Commissioner Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.